Over my thirty-two plus year career, I continued to see mistakes in legal documents prepared by attorneys along with the failure to review and update these legal documents by their clients. No offense to the many "flawless" attorneys out there. These are the biggest mistakes that I often see:
- Failure by the attorney to make certain that individual and joint assets are re-titled into the new Revocable Living Trust by the client.
- Failure in drafting a Revocable Living Trust (mostly on purpose) that names a bank or corporate trustee.
- Failure by the client to update their legal documents periodically.
- Failure by the attorney, again on purpose, to force the creation of one or more Testamentary Trusts at the death of the grantors.
- Failure to have clear language regarding beneficiaries ability to accept their share outright, or as a lump sum.
- Failure in drafting a Revocable Living Trust that restricts all beneficiaries as if they were all addicted to drugs, having maritial problems, or are a spendthrift.
- Failure to record a deed for real estate into the name of the Revocable Living Trust.
- Failure by the attorney to make clear their fee and timetable to perform trust updates.
- Failure by the attorney to obtain client signatures in all the proper places.
- Failure by the attorney in not drafting a "see-through trust" when recommending the beneficiary of qualified plans and IRA's be the new Revocable Living Trust.
Let's take these one by one.
Number one is very typical. The attorney drafts the document, then tells the client to re-title everything, yet nobody follows up to see that it is completed.
Number two in most cases is totally unnecessary for middle class families. Someone with a small estate has no need for a bank trustee. This should be a no-brainer by the attorney, but I have seen it often.
Number three is very common. Sometimes the grantor's beneficiary dies before they do and the Revocable Living Trust is never updated. Further still, the grantor may have wanted to change their beneficiaries, but did not get around to it.
Number four is a pure money grab by the attorney, in my opinion. The grantor paid the attorney for the Revocable Living Trust, then the attorney never explained and the client never read it to see that each beneficiary cannot have access to their share of the estate. Only the income from the principal and for their health and welfare. By adding Testamentary Trusts which are created upon the death of the last grantor, then this is what you end up with. This makes each beneficiary have to hire an attorney. You see, even though your parents left you a share, since you are three siblings for example, then all three have to hire their own attorney to draft their own Testamentary Trust. One attorney cannot represent three siblings. They are barred from doing so since each sibling has competing interests and different beneficiaries.
Number five is related to number four. There is no provision for an outright distribution or lump-sum distribution for beneficiaries when Testamentary Trusts are created. You do not need Testamentary Trusts if you pay beneficiaries outright.
Number six is where the attorney drafts the Revocable Living Trust so that all beneficiaries are considered spendthrifts or have marriage or addiction problems. Each family is different, but attorneys tend to treat all the beneficiaries the same when they draft legal documents, even if only one beneficiary has issues.
Number seven is related to number one. I see this a lot. The attorney tells the client to do a quit claim deed, but there is a breakdown in communication somewhere along the line and the quit claim deed does not get filed with the county where the real estate is located.
Number eight is where the attorneys gladly take the client's money to do the initial drafting of the Revocable Living Trust, but do not have a clear explanation about their fee to update the trust as the client's lives change, or tax laws change. Clients are left to wonder how much it costs for an update and typically blow it off and file it away in the "I'll do it later" category. For example, in Florida, the Revocable Living Trust, the Pour-Over Will and the Financial Powers of Attorney should all be witnessed by two people with their full addresses. Everyone, the grantor and the two witnesses signatures should also be notarized. You may have a problem in Florida if the trust does not have two witnesses and a notarization of everyone's signature. You do not want to find out when someone passes away about this issue. Do an Estate Planning Review!
Number nine is another no-brainer. Believe it or not, most attorneys leave the notarization up to someone who works for them in their office. This is ripe for mistakes. I have seen it numerous times where a signature is left blank, or not dated properly and where the grantor's date and the notary's date do not match. Plus, scribbling through something and initialing it, is a mistake. Never ever scribble through anything on a legal document. RE-DO IT!! The attorney that allows this on a newly created trust is not professional, but rather lazy, in my opinion.
Number ten can be costly. I had a client whose attorney let her husband name his Revocable Living Trust as the beneficiary of his IRA. His wife was a beneficiary, but there was also a corporate beneficiary. This failed to meet the definition of a "see-through trust" as far as the IRS is concerned, because a corporation is not a person. Therefore, you cannot "see-through it" to any person. As a result, the wife could not treat the IRA as her own and she had to take it all out in five years.
There you have my 10 Critical Mistakes in Estate Planning. Trust me, it is worthwhile to have someone like me take a look at your legal documents. Although, I am not an attorney, I am qualified by training and experience as a Certified Financial Planner® to review estate planning documents. By this I mean that I can read!
No comments:
Post a Comment